| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thread: right-justified |
| Date: | 2026-07-09 13:24:49 |
| Message-ID: | bc61eb97-f798-4b5c-821c-4c19ad8410f6@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 7/9/26 12:33 AM, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Thu, 9 Jul 2026 11:16:51 +0800, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
>> The attached image shows that the ``Thread: `` line is right-justified.
>> Is this the expected behavior?
>>
>> I only just realized that the ``Thread:`` line is clickable. I wasn't
>> aware of that before.
>
> From what I can see, it doesn't appear to be right-justified. Rather,
> it's left-aligned with indentation. I suspect that message is simply
> quite deep in the thread.
>
> On my system, clicking that list expands it to show the parent/child
> relationships between the messages, including the parts that are
> initially hidden beyond the right edge of the box. Given that, I think
> omitting the indentation only when the thread is collapsed would
> probably require a bit of extra work.
^ this is the intended behavior to show both the parent/child
relationship, and how deep the messages are within the thread.
Maybe we can throw some icons into it now (e.g. ↳) to make the
lineage clearer, but we'd likely have to still use the indentation scheme.
Thanks,
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ewan Young | 2026-07-10 05:05:14 | Account locked: OAuth login disabled & cannot set local password |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2026-07-09 04:33:10 | Re: Thread: right-justified |