Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business

From: DEVOPS_WwIT <devops(at)ww-it(dot)cn>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business
Date: 2021-09-19 01:43:22
Message-ID: bb6ef23b-25aa-f7e5-dc5b-4eb1cd604296@ww-it.cn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

+1 backporting

Tony

On 2021/9/19 01:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
> 5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]. While updating the v14 release notes,
> I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
> have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.
>
> I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
> in 14beta3. Thoughts?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ%3DuWWWfQ%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-19 04:25:20 Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2021-09-19 01:28:49 Undocumented AT TIME ZONE INTERVAL syntax