Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
Date: 2025-11-10 20:00:01
Message-ID: baaa4eec-1f00-4aeb-9fa1-5ba96f5860dd@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

10.11.2025 21:33, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 09:00:01PM +0200, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>> I got 100 iterations passed (12 of them hanged) without that Assert
>> triggered.
> But those hangs were unrelated to the assert then, right?

Yeah, I think there are several unrelated issues here.

>> The failure rate is approximately 1 per 30 runs.
> Is that the same failure rate you got before?

Yes, AFAICS, s/SIGURG/SIGXCPU/ didn't affect the failure and it's rate.

Best regards,
Alexander

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-11-10 20:03:27 obsolete autovacuum comment
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-11-10 19:56:23 Re: [Proposal] Adding callback support for custom statistics kinds