| From: | Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?) |
| Date: | 2004-10-03 14:49:12 |
| Message-ID: | b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
Not that my 2c is worth 1c, but I second this. I'd rather initdb now
than get bitten by some catalog difference when I move my DB into
production. :)
--miker
On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:22:50 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
[...]
>
> > I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the same catalog.
>
> Well, there's something to be said for that viewpoint too. Anyone else
> feel the same?
[...]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2004-10-03 17:24:28 | Re: [HACKERS] OT moving from MS SQL to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-03 14:18:51 | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitaly Belman | 2004-10-03 18:05:56 | Re: Writing plpgsql not in a function (directly from plsql)? |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2004-10-03 14:44:38 | Re: last dtae of the month |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John DeSoi | 2004-10-03 15:50:38 | Re: Postgres Doubt |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-10-03 11:18:27 | Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd |