Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
Date: 2025-09-19 11:05:19
Message-ID: b88c76d0-bf71-43aa-8bfe-7a07f82766da@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19.09.25 10:22, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> There are two things we could do. One is to simply restrict `git blame`
> to authenticated users; this shouldn't be_too_ bad. But if we don't
> want that, we could put the bot checker javascript tricks in front of
> `blame`. In fact maybe we could have the best of both worlds: you get
> the javascript check if you're not authenticated, but nothing if you
> are. I'm not sure how easy it is to implement this though.

Or just disable git blame. Who needs to run that through the website?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-09-19 11:08:53 Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-09-19 11:04:15 Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb