Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb
Date: 2025-09-19 11:08:53
Message-ID: ACBF5486-8A4F-4A03-A48C-2D639B51EDD8@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 19 Sep 2025, at 13:05, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 19.09.25 10:22, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>> There are two things we could do. One is to simply restrict `git blame`
>> to authenticated users; this shouldn't be_too_ bad. But if we don't
>> want that, we could put the bot checker javascript tricks in front of
>> `blame`. In fact maybe we could have the best of both worlds: you get
>> the javascript check if you're not authenticated, but nothing if you
>> are. I'm not sure how easy it is to implement this though.
>
> Or just disable git blame. Who needs to run that through the website?

We could jut link to the postgres mirror on Github for that.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2025-09-19 11:14:37 Re: Fix typo in comment of match_orclause_to_indexcol()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-09-19 11:05:19 Re: Having postgresql.org link to cgit instead of gitweb