| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gunnar Morling <gunnar(dot)morling(at)googlemail(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unexpected behavior when setting "idle_replication_slot_timeout" |
| Date: | 2025-07-10 05:51:36 |
| Message-ID: | b69236c25061d5ee1e4fcd5fb7de1193db3f1338.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 05:27 +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> > > The "hybrid approach" saves the two seconds on system with injection points,
> > > but cannot simplify the code.
> >
> > I feel that would be a needless complexity in the test.
>
> Yeah, it is the down side of the approach. If it do not have enough advantage, let's drop the idea.
Great, then I think that we have consensus.
Let's change to seconds and leave the injectsion points and tests as they are.
I'd still like to see the documentation improved, like my patch tried to do.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-07-10 07:03:37 | Re: BUG #18897: Logical replication conflict after using pg_createsubscriber under heavy load |
| Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2025-07-10 05:27:08 | RE: Unexpected behavior when setting "idle_replication_slot_timeout" |