Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
Date: 2025-06-11 04:33:07
Message-ID: b448cc01-ce8d-45f3-a922-c63490bbdec4@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2025/06/11 11:49, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> While looking at the thread [1], I've remembered this thread.
> The patches in this thread are partially v18-related, but include
> enhancement or fixes for existing feature, so should they be postponed
> to v19, or should be separated properly to v18 part and other?
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/70372bdd-4399-4d5b-ab4f-6d4487a4911a%40oss.nttdata.com

I see these patches more as enhancements to psql tab-completion,
rather than fixes for clear oversights in the original commit.

For example, if tab-completion for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES had
completely missed LARGE OBJECTS, that would be an obvious oversight.
But these patches go beyond that kind of issue.

That said, if others think it's appropriate to include them in v18
for consistency or completeness, I'm fine with that.

Regarding the 0002 patch:

- else if (Matches("GRANT", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("TO");
- else if (Matches("REVOKE", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("FROM");
+ else if (Matches("GRANT/REVOKE", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
+ {
+ if (TailMatches("FOREIGN", "SERVER"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_servers);
+ else if (!TailMatches("LARGE", "OBJECT"))
+ {
+ if (Matches("GRANT", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("TO");
+ else
+ COMPLETE_WITH("FROM");
+ }
+ }

Wouldn't this change break the case where "GRANT ... ON TABLE ... <TAB>"
is supposed to complete with "TO"?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2025-06-11 04:45:17 Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Previous Message Shinya Kato 2025-06-11 03:29:26 Re: Extend COPY FROM with HEADER <integer> to skip multiple lines