Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects

From: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
Date: 2025-06-11 04:57:37
Message-ID: 20250611135737.bb7d3135141248819704ebca@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:33:07 +0900
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On 2025/06/11 11:49, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > While looking at the thread [1], I've remembered this thread.
> > The patches in this thread are partially v18-related, but include
> > enhancement or fixes for existing feature, so should they be postponed
> > to v19, or should be separated properly to v18 part and other?
> >
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/70372bdd-4399-4d5b-ab4f-6d4487a4911a%40oss.nttdata.com
>
> I see these patches more as enhancements to psql tab-completion,
> rather than fixes for clear oversights in the original commit.
>
> For example, if tab-completion for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES had
> completely missed LARGE OBJECTS, that would be an obvious oversight.
> But these patches go beyond that kind of issue.
>
> That said, if others think it's appropriate to include them in v18
> for consistency or completeness, I'm fine with that.
>
> Regarding the 0002 patch:
>
> - else if (Matches("GRANT", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
> - COMPLETE_WITH("TO");
> - else if (Matches("REVOKE", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
> - COMPLETE_WITH("FROM");
> + else if (Matches("GRANT/REVOKE", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
> + {
> + if (TailMatches("FOREIGN", "SERVER"))
> + COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_servers);
> + else if (!TailMatches("LARGE", "OBJECT"))
> + {
> + if (Matches("GRANT", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))
> + COMPLETE_WITH("TO");
> + else
> + COMPLETE_WITH("FROM");
> + }
> + }
>
> Wouldn't this change break the case where "GRANT ... ON TABLE ... <TAB>"
> is supposed to complete with "TO"?

Sorry, I made a stupid mistake.

> + else if (Matches("GRANT/REVOKE", MatchAnyN, "ON", MatchAny, MatchAny))

This should be "GRANT|REVOKE".

I've attached update patches. (There is no change on 0001.)

Best regards,
Yugo Nagata

--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0002-psql-Some-improvement-of-tab-completion-for-GRANT.patch text/x-diff 1.7 KB
v2-0001-psql-Improve-psql-tab-completion-for-GRANT-REVOKE.patch text/x-diff 1.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2025-06-11 05:03:01 Re: Extend ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES for large objects
Previous Message Florents Tselai 2025-06-11 04:57:07 Re: add function for creating/attaching hash table in DSM registry