Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch
Date: 2008-08-24 13:30:18
Message-ID: b42b73150808240630r59ad34f3l24a980280cdc52d9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I assume there is no TODO here.

Well, there doesn't seem to be a TODO for partial/restartable vacuums,
which were mentioned upthread. This is a really desirable feature for
big databases and removes one of the reasons to partition large
tables.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2008-08-24 13:48:54 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2008-08-24 13:16:43 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-08-24 15:49:51 Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-08-23 20:31:48 Re: Add missing descriptions for aggregates, functions and conversions