| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch |
| Date: | 2008-08-24 15:49:51 |
| Message-ID: | 48B1831F.7010002@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> I assume there is no TODO here.
>
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a TODO for partial/restartable vacuums,
> which were mentioned upthread. This is a really desirable feature for
> big databases and removes one of the reasons to partition large
> tables.
I would agree that partial vacuums would be very useful.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> merlin
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-24 16:00:01 | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-08-24 15:45:56 | Re: What in the world is happening on spoonbill? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2008-08-24 18:40:23 | Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-08-24 13:30:18 | Re: [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch |