From: | "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Schema design question |
Date: | 2008-03-31 17:34:24 |
Message-ID: | b35603930803311034h16ab5623q724d0d176ff890df@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 29/03/2008, Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm working on a project which requires me to keep track of objects,
> each of which can have an arbitrary number of attributes. Although
> there will be many attributes that an object can have, the data types
> of those attributes won't be all that varried (int, float, text,
> boolean, date, etc.).
And a somewhat unorthodox suggestion for the list ... would it
be worthwhile considering a different storage mechanism all
together, like maybe an LDAP directory type of thing? The query
language is admittedly very limited.
Cheers,
Andrej
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-31 17:38:04 | Re: [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-31 17:27:25 | Re: Very slow catalog query |