| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi |
| Subject: | Re: WAL record CRC calculated incorrectly because of underlying buffer modification |
| Date: | 2026-10-29 02:19:14 |
| Message-ID: | auKtIrePSfV5THtK@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 11:57:53AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Fair enough. I guess I'd hoped that one of the folks involved in adding the
> hash index WAL logging would chime in and fix this properly.
If input does not show up, I see nothing to do here except somebody
else popping up to take responsibility for the change. Actually, I
may not mind, this stuff is annoying..
Applied the workaround down to v17 for now.
> Ceterum censeo index access/hash esse delendum.
I doubt we would be able to do that, if ever.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-10-29 02:27:24 | Re: WAL record CRC calculated incorrectly because of underlying buffer modification |
| Previous Message | shihao zhong | 2026-10-29 02:11:20 | Re: [PG19] pg_upgrade --check passes, then the upgrade fails |