| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding init-po and update-po targets to the meson build system |
| Date: | 2026-10-07 16:24:29 |
| Message-ID: | asZxSXw6qRN2X_c9@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Oct-07, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> So, my solution is switching to using nls.json files instead
> of nls.mk files and having a Perl script so that the autoconf system
> can parse these nls.json files and read them as nls.mk files as
> before. So the big picture is:
>
> - We will switch nls.mk files with nls.json files.
> - autoconf will read these nls.json files with the help of perl script.
> - meson will read nls.json files and will use a helper Python script
> to generate *.pot files.
> - meson will have init-po and update-po targets and also singular
> targes like psql-init-po.
Hmm, so the source files would be .json and we generate .mk files as
derivative artifacts? I don't know, that sounds potentially
nightmarish. Isn't it more convenient to generate a JSON file from the
nls.mk list instead?
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Once again, thank you and all of the developers for your hard work on
PostgreSQL. This is by far the most pleasant management experience of
any database I've worked on." (Dan Harris)
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-04/msg00247.php
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daria Lepikhova | 2026-10-07 16:30:38 | Re: Incremental backups report progress as if they were full backups |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2026-10-07 16:18:09 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can't complete after ~105M concurrent updates/deletes |