| From: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Adding init-po and update-po targets to the meson build system |
| Date: | 2026-10-07 15:35:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAN55FZ1Z0yb5JnsnBHYB1g76gqr0Oi3tRHJaH=2464X-UFi-_A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I am working on adding init-po and update-po targets to the meson
build system and have a a couple of questions. First let me explain my
current thinking.
I think the biggest problem is the nls.mk files. autoconf read these
files to generate *.pot files but meson can't read these nls.mk files
natively. So, my solution is switching to using nls.json files instead
of nls.mk files and having a Perl script so that the autoconf system
can parse these nls.json files and read them as nls.mk files as
before. So the big picture is:
- We will switch nls.mk files with nls.json files.
- autoconf will read these nls.json files with the help of perl script.
- meson will read nls.json files and will use a helper Python script
to generate *.pot files.
- meson will have init-po and update-po targets and also singular
targes like psql-init-po.
Does that sound good?
----------------------------------------
Some additional questions:
1. Can init-po and update-po meson targets regenerate *.pot files on
every run or should these files be tracked and regenerated only when
inputs change?
-- I am asking this because implementing the prior one is simpler.
Latter one requires more complicated changes.
2. How closely must the output from meson and autoconf match?
-- Should meson preserve autoconf’s source-reference paths and
ordering exactly, or are differences acceptable? In particular,
generated sources can produce build-tree relative references through
their #line directives. Should we normalize them?
Do you have anything else in mind?
I CCed Álvaro and Peter since I remember they use / work on these areas.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-10-07 15:40:38 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) can't complete after ~105M concurrent updates/deletes |
| Previous Message | shihao zhong | 2026-10-07 15:26:51 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) might keep dropped-column data |