| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joao Detomini <joao(dot)detomini(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgbackrest(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_resetwal: refuse to run when backup_label exists |
| Date: | 2026-10-05 22:32:19 |
| Message-ID: | asQlc0x7FPjAWdvJ@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 12:04:14PM -0300, Joao Detomini wrote:
> Nothing to change from my side, v3 looks fine to me. I'll put it
> back to Needs review for now, since Michael hasn't said whether he's
> ok with -f not overriding the check.
I'm maybe just not seeing the value of the patch, then, that's all, so
I doubt that my opinion has any value.
Please note that the community mailing lists follow the following
style in terms of message posting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Bottom-posting
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mihail Nikalayeu | 2026-10-05 22:35:00 | Re: Logical replication: lost updates/deletes and invalid log messages caused by SnapshotDirty + concurrent updates |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-10-05 22:27:24 | Re: WAL segment file descriptor leak on read errors can PANIC the server |