| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Naga Appani <nagnrik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring |
| Date: | 2026-09-22 15:46:56 |
| Message-ID: | arKi8Jdv8EwASlgZ@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 09:58:38AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> That would be OK here. CC-ing Nathan for RMT input, as this would
>> require a catversion bump.
>
> I don't have an issue with a catversion bump as long as it's before GA
> and it doesn't make it more likely we'll have to change it again after
> GA.
Same. I'd think before RC1 would be preferable.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2026-09-22 15:59:54 | Re: System views for versions reporting |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2026-09-22 15:44:39 | Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed |