Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Naga Appani <nagnrik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring
Date: 2026-09-22 13:58:38
Message-ID: CAAKRu_bE11PUHDVthMoKXownefkzB8H31WLTvq2XXy5WgJsTxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:22:35PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> > I guess pg_get_multixact_usage() sounds better to me and it matches the
> > code comment:
>
> That would be OK here. CC-ing Nathan for RMT input, as this would
> require a catversion bump.

I don't have an issue with a catversion bump as long as it's before GA
and it doesn't make it more likely we'll have to change it again after
GA.

- Melanie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-09-22 14:03:02 Re: Add a permission check to pg_stat_get_backend_subxact()
Previous Message Zhijie Hou 2026-09-22 13:51:17 Re: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES