Re: Orphaned Files in PostgreSQL

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Orphaned Files in PostgreSQL
Date: 2026-08-21 06:55:19
Message-ID: aof2V2jdcD67HPeO@bdtpg
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 02:40:25PM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am revisiting this thread to propose a possible fix for this known issue.

Thanks for working on this!

> This ordering guarantees that relation storage cannot become durable
> without either a durable marker or WAL capable of reconstructing that
> marker.

I wonder if logging XLOG_SMGR_CREATE before smgrcreate() could interact badly
with a concurrent checkpoint? I looked at [1] and it looks like it used a separate
PRECREATE record and kept the usual CREATE record after physical creation.

Could this be reused here, independently of the rest of its undo infrastructure?

[1]: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D0ULqYgM2aFeOnrx6YrtBg3xUdxALoyCG%2BXpssKqmezug%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-08-21 07:00:48 Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify AS requirement when VALUES used in a FROM clause
Previous Message Peter Smith 2026-08-21 06:53:21 Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications