Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan
Date: 2026-08-15 23:50:08
Message-ID: aoD7MFTWsfEDbhLi@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 07:43:02PM -0400, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 7:38 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> My buildfarm member batta is running recovery test 027 with
>> wal_consistency_checking, with:
>> PG_TEST_EXTRA => "regress_dump_restore wal_consistency_checking saslprep",
>
> Did you intend to respond to the nearby thread about
> wal_consistency_checking? This thread is about LP_DEAD marking going
> wrong in gist, but technically it's unrelated to the
> wal_consistency_checking thing.

Sorry about that, wrong thread. :)
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-08-15 23:53:10 Re: GiST wal_consistency_checking issue
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2026-08-15 23:43:02 Re: gistkillitems can LP_DEAD-mark the wrong tuples on a rescan