Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hironobu SUZUKI <hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Date: 2020-01-05 09:02:29
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.2001050953530.1648@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This patch was marked as RFC on 2019-03-30, but since then there have
> been a couple more issues pointed out in a review by Thomas Munro, and
> it went through 2019-09 and 2019-11 without any attention. Is the RFC
> status still appropriate?

Thomas review was about comments/documentation wording and asking for
explanations, which I think I addressed, and the code did not actually
change, so I'm not sure that the "needs review" is really needed, but do
as you feel.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Surafel Temesgen 2020-01-05 10:16:34 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-01-05 08:53:43 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)