Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal

From: Fabien COELHO <fabien(dot)coelho(at)mines-paristech(dot)fr>
To: Martin Liška <marxin(dot)liska(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal
Date: 2019-11-15 12:01:21
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1911151300060.4427@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Yes, after the revision I see other failing tests like:

Indeed, I can confirm there are still 18/195 fails with the updated gcc.

> I'm going to investigate that and will inform you guys.

Great, thanks!

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2019-11-15 12:03:13 Re: Building infrastructure for B-Tree deduplication that recognizes when opclass equality is also equivalence
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2019-11-15 11:58:36 Re: [PATCH][BUG FIX] Unsafe access pointers.