Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal

From: Martin Liška <marxin(dot)liska(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <fabien(dot)coelho(at)mines-paristech(dot)fr>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: segfault in geqo on experimental gcc animal
Date: 2019-11-15 12:11:36
Message-ID: CAObPJ3N6QhVozehYpx3H6D7k8bTtjo5LTyOwBzDc9x6TTYtCuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heh, it's me who now breaks postgresql build:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92529

Martin

On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 13:01, Fabien COELHO
<fabien(dot)coelho(at)mines-paristech(dot)fr> wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, after the revision I see other failing tests like:
>
> Indeed, I can confirm there are still 18/195 fails with the updated gcc.
>
> > I'm going to investigate that and will inform you guys.
>
> Great, thanks!
>
> --
> Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2019-11-15 12:24:04 RE: [PATCH][BUG FIX] Unsafe access pointers.
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2019-11-15 12:03:13 Re: Building infrastructure for B-Tree deduplication that recognizes when opclass equality is also equivalence