Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT
Date: 2018-12-28 15:46:10
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1812281644350.6632@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> At first i also try to do it like that but it seems the function will
> became long and more complex to me

Probably. But calling it with size 100 should result in the same behavior,
so it is really just an extension of the preceeding one? Or am I missing
something?

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-28 16:23:58 Re: removal of dangling temp tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-28 15:16:07 Re: Poor buildfarm coverage of strong-random alternatives