Re[2]: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Bradley DeJong <bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re[2]: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData
Date: 2018-08-27 06:43:02
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1808270833240.11066@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,

My 0.02€ on the text:

> Version 2.0 of the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> protocol
>
> In the v3.0 protocol,
>
> the 3.0 protocol
>
> version 3.0 of the copy-in/copy-out sub-protocol
>
> the V2.0 protocol.

While reading nice English (I learned "holdover"), it occurs to me that
references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.

Should it use v, V or version?

I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version, and "the
version X.0 protocol" for long if really desired.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-27 07:11:48 some more error location support
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-27 06:34:17 pg_dump test instability