| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr |
| Cc: | bpd0018(at)gmail(dot)com, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Adding a note to protocol.sgml regarding CopyData |
| Date: | 2018-08-27 07:37:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20180827.163729.1976562132311319664.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Hello Bradley & Tatsuo-san,
>
> My 0.02€ on the text:
>
>> Version 2.0 of the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> protocol
>> In the v3.0 protocol,
>> the 3.0 protocol
>> version 3.0 of the copy-in/copy-out sub-protocol
>> the V2.0 protocol.
>
> While reading nice English (I learned "holdover"), it occurs to me
> that references to the protocol version lacks homogeneity.
>
> Should it use v, V or version?
>
> I'd suggest to keep "the vX.0 protocol" for a short version, and "the
> version X.0 protocol" for long if really desired.
+1
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-08-27 08:41:21 | Re: some more error location support |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-08-27 07:11:48 | some more error location support |