|From:||Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>|
|To:||Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Doc patch: add RECURSIVE to bookindex|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
>> Why referencing only create_view, but not delete, insert, update, select
>> or select_into where RECURSIVE is also used?
>> ISTM that at least the select page should be referenced, I'm less sure of
>> the others because there it appears only in the synopsys.
> Looking at other occurrences of <indexterm>, it seems
> they're used quite sparingly, limiting the references to only
> the pages that have the most relevant explanation for the term,
> as opposed to trying to be exhaustive.
> For instance, select.sgml has only three <indexterm>, and
> the entries for WHERE or JOIN don't even refer to it.
> ISTM that it's on purpose, to keep the index lean, and it works.
Patch applies cleanly, doc build ok, works for me.
|Next Message||Bruce Momjian||2018-07-31 19:11:52||Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots|
|Previous Message||Fabien COELHO||2018-07-31 19:02:36||Re: Usability fail with psql's \dp command|