Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Date: 2018-05-08 19:22:14
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1805082111290.14747@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hello Alvaro,

>> I think that I'll have time for a round of review in the first half of July.
>> Providing a rebased patch before then would be nice.

> Note that even in the absence of a rebased patch, you can apply to an
> older checkout if you have some limited window of time for a review.

Yes, sure. I'd like to bring this feature to be committable, so it will
have to be rebased at some point anyway.

> Looking over the diff, I find that this patch tries to do too much and
> needs to be split up.

Yep, I agree that it would help the reviewing process. On the other hand I
have bad memories about maintaining dependent patches which interfere
significantly. Maybe it may not the case with this feature.

Thanks for the advices.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-05-08 19:36:21 Re: [HACKERS] WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-05-08 17:57:47 perlcritic script