From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql --batch |
Date: | 2017-08-28 11:28:52 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.20.1708281319120.9003@lancre |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I don't doubt about a sense of this configuration - but this specific
> combination depends on usage - so I don't think so using special option is
> good idea.
Although I agree with you that detailed settings are definitely debatable,
I'd say that at least it would be a more reasonable starting point for
scripting than the default configuration which is more interactive usage
oriented.
So even if unperfect, one is free to update defaults to suit more closely
their needs, eg "psql -B -F ':' ...", at least most of the scripting
conviniencies are already there.
I think that such a scripting mode should also imply --no-readline.
--
Fabien.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-28 11:39:36 | Re: 1 test fails in make installcheck-world - database "regress_ecpg_user2" does not exist |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-08-28 11:14:54 | Re: [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |