Re: Is there any ordering to the values in guc.c?

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there any ordering to the values in guc.c?
Date: 2015-10-29 07:46:38
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.10.1510290844330.17479@sto
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On 10/28/15 10:27 AM, Bill Moran wrote:
>> See subject. Aside from them being divvied up by datatype, they seem
>> to be ordered randomly. Since I'm putting together a patch that will
>> add some GUCs, do I just add them to the end of the list?
>
> The initial commit grouped them logically, and it went downhill from
> there. :)

Some "per-section" comments in the file would help to remain consistent.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-10-29 07:46:52 Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-10-29 07:44:31 Re: PoC: Partial sort