| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PoC: Partial sort |
| Date: | 2015-10-29 07:44:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAM3SWZQd6pgRLEc5tddzVYrvmrqAN3AE63VD+tGKcs8UBq_HoA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Planner regression is fixed in the attached version of patch. It appears
> that get_cheapest_fractional_path_for_pathkeys() behaved wrong when no
> ordering is required.
I don't see an entry in the CF app for this. This seems like something
I should review, though.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2015-10-29 07:46:38 | Re: Is there any ordering to the values in guc.c? |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2015-10-29 06:59:03 | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |