Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
Date: 2010-09-09 08:27:43
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.1009091026280.2626@localhost.localdomain (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-docs
>> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
>> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
> It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
> separate section.

I agree that a general caveat is better, together with a one line 
reference in the documentation of each table with an issue.


In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-09-10 13:36:40
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-09-09 06:48:02
Subject: Re: Doc fixes and improvements

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Ashesh VashiDate: 2010-09-09 09:55:15
Subject: Re: BUG #5641: Can not create any python language
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-09-08 18:57:38
Subject: Re: BUG #5629: ALTER SEQUENCE foo START execute a RESTART

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group