Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
Date: 2010-09-09 08:27:43
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.00.1009091026280.2626@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs


>> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
>> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
>
> It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
> separate section.

I agree that a general caveat is better, together with a one line
reference in the documentation of each table with an issue.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashesh Vashi 2010-09-09 09:55:15 Re: BUG #5641: Can not create any python language
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-08 18:57:38 Re: BUG #5629: ALTER SEQUENCE foo START execute a RESTART

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-09-10 13:36:40 Re: [DOCS] Doc fixes and improvements
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-09-09 06:48:02 Re: Doc fixes and improvements