| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS |
| Date: | 2011-02-20 00:11:01 |
| Message-ID: | 201102200011.p1K0B1l06164@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> >> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
> >> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
> >
> > It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
> > separate section.
>
> I agree that a general caveat is better, together with a one line
> reference in the documentation of each table with an issue.
Oh, I just noticed this. Can you give me a list of information_schema
tables that have this issue? I am only aware of
referential_constraints.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2011-02-20 07:48:21 | Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-19 23:22:11 | Re: issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-20 01:33:23 | Re: Terms. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-19 23:22:11 | Re: issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS |