| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: test git conversion |
| Date: | 2012-01-23 19:16:21 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.BSO.2.00.1201231358460.30215@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> Thanks, Kris--I really appreciate the help. I added patches to the
> conversion script to strip the tags from that first set, but I'm still
> not sure what to do on the second set, since it looks like there is no
> other activity on the REL6_4 branch (no tags, even). It seems like
> what you are saying is that REL6_4 should just point at the next
> commit in the main development branch: is that right?
Correct.
> It looks like the same set of changes was committed to both trunk and
> the branch, and nothing else ever happened on that branch. You're
> saying that we should just drop that branch point and have the git
> branch point at f44a35... (see gist linked above) as a stub branch
> (that is, a branch with no commits of its own), yes?
Yes.
Also, I've posted an updated version of the CVS repo at:
It didn't produce any new manufactured commits, so I think we're getting
close to being ready for a move. I will start a new thread to discuss the
actual details/timing of that.
Kris Jurka
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Johnston | 2012-01-23 19:33:28 | Re: Java 1.4 |
| Previous Message | Lew | 2012-01-23 18:21:03 | Re: Java 1.4 |