From: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: test git conversion |
Date: | 2012-01-24 18:05:50 |
Message-ID: | CAH_hXRaUr_jXLYDu6QoON5muyG_dvprnMu1Sez-u9F0drauH0A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
>> It looks like the same set of changes was committed to both trunk and
>> the branch, and nothing else ever happened on that branch. You're
>> saying that we should just drop that branch point and have the git
>> branch point at f44a35... (see gist linked above) as a stub branch
>> (that is, a branch with no commits of its own), yes?
>
> Yes.
Done. I think the only remaining thing is the keyword cleanup. I
presume what I suggested before works (keep keyword expansion as it
was in CVS; do a cleanup commit in git in all active branches to purge
expandable keywords; I believe this is what the main project did)? I
took out the "grep -v"s from the tag verification script to see what
was there, and there are some subtantial diffs around that. I tried
tweaking the cvs2git config, but that only gives different diffs. I
need to spend more time looking at this, but I should be done soon
(though if anyone has any insight here, I welcome it).
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2012-01-25 07:38:31 | GIT move |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2012-01-24 17:54:50 | Re: Java 1.4 |