| From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Milovantsev <pavel(dot)milovantsev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unified setBlobs / setBinaryStream question |
| Date: | 2010-04-30 22:02:33 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.BSO.2.00.1004301801440.102@leary.csoft.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010, Pavel Milovantsev wrote:
> At the old JDBC driver documentation there is a string about moving
> set/getBlob to use BYTEA type:
>
> Note: In a future release of the JDBC Driver, the getBLOB() and setBLOB()
> methods may no longer interact with Large Objects and will instead work on
> bytea data types. So it is recommended that you use the LargeObject API if
> you intend to use Large Objects.
>
> At the recent JDBC driver documentation this line is absent. Does it mean
> that roadmap plans are changed?
>
There are no current plans to change get/setBlob to work on bytea.
Kris Jurka
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maxime Lévesque | 2010-05-01 03:20:20 | sending a block through jdbc |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2010-04-30 22:01:24 | Re: getSuperTables |