Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-22 18:55:41
Message-ID: alpine.BSF.2.00.1011221455250.19981@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


206.223.169.93 anoncvs.postgresql.org

maybe 'cvs.postgresql.org' should be pointed ther too, for the archives?

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 17:29, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> We have nearly ten years of pgsql-committers archives that are now next
>> door to useless, because the anoncvs diff links in them are now 404.
>> Could we have that service back please?
>
> Uh, that's a good point. Thinko.
>
> Marc, hopefully you didn't zap it yet? Can you bring the machine back?
> (it also needs to get the DNS entry back - I don't recall what it used
> to be, so please do that when you get there)
>
>
> --
>  Magnus Hagander
>  Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>  Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-11-22 19:24:39 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-22 18:54:57 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?