Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Date: 2010-11-22 16:36:10
Message-ID: AANLkTimCTs-Rn67PGxkK9aN8vRfi54CqGUmkOPV_uTY=@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 17:29, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> We have nearly ten years of pgsql-committers archives that are now next
> door to useless, because the anoncvs diff links in them are now 404.
> Could we have that service back please?

Uh, that's a good point. Thinko.

Marc, hopefully you didn't zap it yet? Can you bring the machine back?
(it also needs to get the DNS entry back - I don't recall what it used
to be, so please do that when you get there)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2010-11-22 18:54:57 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-22 16:29:34 Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?