| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum |
| Date: | 2026-06-25 06:19:57 |
| Message-ID: | ajzIjd8sb2wiIXs5@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 01:53:39PM +0800, cca5507 wrote:
> I think the current one is ok, so I didn't change this.
+ * Note: this function is called without holding a relation lock for database-wide
+ * VACUUM or ANALYZE, so the relation can be dropped concurrently. In that
+ * case, issue a WARNING and return false.
FWIW, even after sleeping on it, I don't think that this patch is
going in the right direction. I am pretty sure that we should just
lift the ACL check in get_all_vacuum_rels() and always require
vacuum_is_permitted_for_relation() to have the relation locked when
called. This way we would rely on one single code path for the ACL
check, even if it means holding a reference of a relation OID for
something to be processsed later. So I would revisit the choice made
in a556549d7e6d. The isolation test vacuum-conflict also seems OK
with this shortcut, after a quick test, which was the kind of patterns
this commit is after.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2026-06-25 06:33:25 | psql internals queries breaks in presence of user-defined operators |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-06-25 06:14:35 | Re: psql: add tab completion for subscription wal_receiver_timeout |