| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql: add tab completion for subscription wal_receiver_timeout |
| Date: | 2026-06-25 06:14:35 |
| Message-ID: | B9EE1BFC-66E2-4786-B1C0-E2EA6099E9F4@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Jun 24, 2026, at 22:02, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 5:31 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 24, 2026, at 16:23, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 4:52 PM Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>> This is a tiny patch to fix that.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The patch LGTM. I've verified that SUBOPT_WAL_RECEIVER_TIMEOUT is in
>>>> both the CREATE and ALTER supported-option masks.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch! LGTM.
>>>
>>> Since wal_receiver_timeout subscription option is new in v19, I'm thinking
>>> to commit this to v19 rather than v20.
>>
>> I think so.
>
> I've pushed the patch. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fujii Masao
Thanks a lot for pushing.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-06-25 06:19:57 | Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum |
| Previous Message | shveta malik | 2026-06-25 06:07:52 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |