| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: PG19beta1: GCC 16.1.1 warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized in clauses.c |
| Date: | 2026-06-18 16:08:12 |
| Message-ID: | ajQXxk0eohQ8BNe9@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Jun-18, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 11:33:23AM +0000, Hans Buschmann wrote:
> > I also can confirm that this silences the compiler warning of GCC 16.1.1.
>
> Thanks! I'm debating whether to back-patch this to unsupported branches.
> IIUC it qualifies. I'm getting ready to bump up the minimum supported
> version of pg_dump and friends to v10, so maybe I should stop there. But
> also, stopping at v14 might be good enough for something small like this.
> Any opinions?
I'd stop at 14 and call it a day. It doesn't prevent building, which is
IIRC the criteria we use for the older branches.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand
relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of
whom has had a Date with the clue stick." (Andrew Sullivan)
https://postgr.es/m/20050809113420.GD2768@phlogiston.dyndns.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-06-18 16:12:08 | Re: IGNORE/RESPECT NULLS can be specified for (prokind == 'f'). |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-06-18 16:05:03 | Re: AW: PG19beta1: GCC 16.1.1 warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized in clauses.c |