| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Alex Guo <guo(dot)alex(dot)hengchen(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fix DROP PROPERTY GRAPH "unsupported object class" error |
| Date: | 2026-06-17 05:14:48 |
| Message-ID: | ajItSKjvadWQKKaY@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> The term "element" comes later "label v1 of element v1". There's
> nothing in the standard called "element label". That term is an
> artifact of our implementation. I think "label v1 of element v1" reads
> better and follows the standard compared to "element label v1 of
> element v1".
[ ... checks 9075-16-2023 ... ]
The term is "element table label" when referring to a clause, and most
of the places refer to only "label", so I guess that I'm fine with
your wording here.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jihyun bahn | 2026-06-17 05:15:55 | Re: [PATCH] Fix replica identity mismatch for partitioned tables with publish_via_partition_root |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2026-06-17 05:14:09 | Re: Row pattern recognition |