Re: Do quoting more carefully in replication commands

On 2026-Jun-12, Tom Lane wrote:

> (I envision back-patching this all the way, but have not yet
> looked at whether the back branches will require adjustments.)

In a quick skim, I wondered about this bit:

> + * Caution: this quoting logic is sufficient for identifiers and literals
> + * in the replication grammar, but not always in regular SQL. Specifically,
> + * it'd fail for a string literal if standard_conforming_strings is off.

... given that standard_conforming_strings can no longer be off in 19.
The backpatched version should surely still have this, just in case, but
in 19 it's probably not needed.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"After a quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! PostgreSQL was
amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually astounded by
learning new features and techniques made available by the continuing work of
the development team."
Berend Tober, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg01009.php