Re: A trivial fix on a comment in pgstat_assoc_relation()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A trivial fix on a comment in pgstat_assoc_relation()
Date: 2026-06-11 22:33:13
Message-ID: ais3qTvbbngAX3Lx@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 03:09:41PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> This seems to be a vestige from when this function was split out from pgstat_init_relation()
> by commit 5891c7a8ed8f, so I think we could simply remove the "Else".

(Received a poke from Sawada-san on this one.)
Thanks, grabbed this change for later.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-06-11 22:57:33 Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2026-06-11 22:24:52 Re: Commit Sequence Numbers and Visibility