Re: [RFC PATCH v2 RESEND 0/10] Umbra: a remap-aware smgr prototype

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Mingwei Jia <i(at)nayishan(dot)top>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 RESEND 0/10] Umbra: a remap-aware smgr prototype
Date: 2026-06-02 00:35:57
Message-ID: ah4lbfo9Ts26GfFD@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 08:05:00AM +0800, Mingwei Jia wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Thanks for the clarification, and sorry for the noise.
>
> Attached is a tar.gz archive containing the 10 patch files as a single
> attachment, as suggested.
>
> The archive contains:
>
>   umbra-rfc-v2-patches/0001-...
>   ...
>   umbra-rfc-v2-patches/0010-...
>
> This is the same RFC v2 patch set as before; only the delivery format is
> changed.
>
> SHA256:
>
>   2b47ef8e77d1860a2f652cc86a5d030f0bcbc466d5f0fbbf515b20b55835c4b7

Yes, I think that worked; the email had two parts, and the second part
was labeled correctly:

I 1 <no description> [text/plain, 8bit, utf-8, 0.4K]
A 2 umbra-rfc-v2-patches.tar.gz [applica/x-gzip, base64, 316K]

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2026-06-02 00:41:04 Re: [PATCH] Rebuild CHECK constraints after generated column SET EXPRESSION
Previous Message Peter Smith 2026-06-02 00:07:07 Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications