Re: [PATCH] Prevent repeated deadlock-check signals in standby buffer pin waits

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, JoongHyuk Shin <sjh910805(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent repeated deadlock-check signals in standby buffer pin waits
Date: 2026-05-18 20:32:45
Message-ID: agt3Aez4a51JC5Ji@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

On 2026-Apr-21, Michael Paquier wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 02:42:38PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> > Since this change improves recovery-conflict behavior rather than fixing a bug,
> > it doesn't seem to need backpatching and we may need to wait until v20
> > development opens (probably July) before committing it.
>
> Yeah, this one is an improvement, not an actual bug, so let's wait for
> v20 if worth doing (I did not check it).

Hmm, is this related to
https://postgr.es/m/44c24dcf-5710-410f-b1b6-d10b315f3d51@postgrespro.ru ?
In there, Vitaly claims to be reporting a bug that goes back to pg15,
which contradicts this assessment.

Regards,

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"¿Qué importan los años? Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo" (Mafalda)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-05-18 21:22:12 Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st
Previous Message Alexander Pyhalov 2026-05-18 20:06:31 Re: Function scan FDW pushdown