Re: [PATCH] Prevent repeated deadlock-check signals in standby buffer pin waits

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: JoongHyuk Shin <sjh910805(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent repeated deadlock-check signals in standby buffer pin waits
Date: 2026-04-21 05:55:45
Message-ID: aecRYWJmfQnuVDBe@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 02:42:38PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Since this change improves recovery-conflict behavior rather than fixing a bug,
> it doesn't seem to need backpatching and we may need to wait until v20
> development opens (probably July) before committing it.

Yeah, this one is an improvement, not an actual bug, so let's wait for
v20 if worth doing (I did not check it).
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM 2026-04-21 05:58:40 Re: [Bug][patch]: After dropping the last label from a property graph element, invoking pg_get_propgraphdef() triggers an assertion failure
Previous Message 반지현 2026-04-21 05:54:39 Request to expedite cool-off period for new account