Re: DOCS - typos and grammar issues across logical replication docs.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS - typos and grammar issues across logical replication docs.
Date: 2026-04-27 07:18:43
Message-ID: ae8N09isULnOqvpI@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 03:32:24PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> I fed the logical replication online documentation into my favourite
> AI tool to help me come up with the following patch that fixes many
> minor issues (e.g., spelling, grammar, inconsistencies, vagueness,
> etc.).

It is a mixed bag of changes. Some of the suggestions are correct
grammar fixes, some make things somewhat worse, some are irrelevant
(like the s/won't/will not/ or the s/please//).

- When logical replication of a table typically starts, PostgreSQL takes
- a snapshot of the table's data on the publisher database and copies it
+ Logical replication of a table typically starts by PostgreSQL taking
+ a snapshot of the table's data on the publisher database and copying it
to the subscriber. Once complete, changes on the publisher since the

This new sentence makes less sense here. And there's nothing bad with
the original.

Some of these mistakes are older than HEAD, and are user-visible, so
backpatched the most relevant ones.

Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-04-27 07:30:00 Add tests for concurrent DML retry paths in logical replication apply
Previous Message shveta malik 2026-04-27 07:07:52 Re: Parallel Apply