DOCS - typos and grammar issues across logical replication docs.

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: DOCS - typos and grammar issues across logical replication docs.
Date: 2026-04-24 05:32:24
Message-ID: CAHut+PuvY_wYLPJ4DTs7NE9Lu2ty4d-OgZAOJC-NvCM=2wwcQQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi.

(Unfortunately, I was too slow to make this patch, so I missed getting
these fixes into [1]).

I fed the logical replication online documentation into my favourite
AI tool to help me come up with the following patch that fixes many
minor issues (e.g., spelling, grammar, inconsistencies, vagueness,
etc.).

PSA v1.

======
[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/d3bba041543593eb5341683107d899734dc8e73e

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-DOCS-logical-replication-many-little-fixes.patch application/octet-stream 10.9 KB

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-04-24 05:49:40 Re: Fix race condition in pg_get_publication_tables with concurrent DROP TABLE
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-04-24 04:54:18 RE: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”